You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antibiotic prescribing for acute cough: the effect of perceived patient demand.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, March 2006
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel Coenen, Barbara Michiels, Didier Renard, Joke Denekens, Paul Van Royen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2017.
All research outputs
#6,497,306
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,190
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,907
of 92,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.