Title |
Functional regression in crop lodging assessment with digital images
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, September 2002
|
DOI | 10.1198/108571102339 |
Authors |
R. Todd Ogden, Carl E. Miller, Kunio Takezawa, Seishi Ninomiya |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 29% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 21% |
Mathematics | 5 | 18% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,976,997
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics
#54
of 170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,967
of 46,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 170 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them