↓ Skip to main content

Design and analysis of a z-axis tuning fork gyroscope with guided-mechanical coupling

Overview of attention for article published in Microsystem Technologies, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Design and analysis of a z-axis tuning fork gyroscope with guided-mechanical coupling
Published in
Microsystem Technologies, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00542-013-1947-0
Authors

Thong Quang Trinh, Long Quang Nguyen, Dzung Viet Dao, Hoang Manh Chu, Hung Ngoc Vu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Lecturer 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 83%
Design 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Microsystem Technologies
#138
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,398
of 224,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microsystem Technologies
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.