You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differential responses of the right ventricle to abnormal loading conditions in mice: pressure vs. volume load
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Heart Failure, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beatrijs Bartelds, Marinus A. Borgdorff, Annemiek Smit‐van Oosten, Janny Takens, Bibiche Boersma, Marcel G. Nederhoff, Nynke J. Elzenga, Wiek H. van Gilst, Leon J. De Windt, Rolf M.F. Berger |
| Abstract |
Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is a major determinant of long-term morbidity and mortality in congenital heart disease. The right ventricle (RV) is genetically different from the left ventricle (LV), but it is unknown as to whether this has consequences for the cellular responses to abnormal loading conditions. In the LV, calcineurin-activation is a major determinant of pathological hypertrophy and an important target for therapeutic strategies. We studied the functional and molecular adaptation of the RV in mouse models of pressure and volume load, focusing on calcineurin-activation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 25% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,237,301
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#1,772
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,816
of 223,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#257
of 348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.