↓ Skip to main content

A survey of current software for network analysis in molecular biology

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genomics, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
A survey of current software for network analysis in molecular biology
Published in
Human Genomics, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1479-7364-4-5-353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sterling Thomas, Danail Bonchev

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Belgium 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Austria 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 134 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Student > Master 21 14%
Professor 8 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 17%
Computer Science 13 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Chemistry 7 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 25 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2017.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Human Genomics
#211
of 564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,224
of 105,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genomics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.