↓ Skip to main content

Global seafood consumption footprint

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
22 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
464 Mendeley
Title
Global seafood consumption footprint
Published in
Ambio, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-1060-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordi Guillen, Fabrizio Natale, Natacha Carvalho, John Casey, Johann Hofherr, Jean-Noël Druon, Gianluca Fiore, Maurizio Gibin, Antonella Zanzi, Jann Th. Martinsohn

Abstract

To ensure food security and nutritional quality for a growing world population in the face of climate change, stagnant capture fisheries production, increasing aquaculture production and competition for natural resources, countries must be accountable for what they consume rather than what they produce. To investigate the sustainability of seafood consumption, we propose a methodology to examine the impact of seafood supply chains across national boundaries: the seafood consumption footprint. The seafood consumption footprint is expressed as the biomass of domestic and imported seafood production required to satisfy national seafood consumption, and is estimated using a multi-regional input output model. Thus, we reconstruct for the first time the global fish biomass flows in national supply chains to estimate consumption footprints at the global, country and sector levels (capture fisheries, aquaculture, distribution and processing, and reduction into fishmeal and fish oil) taking into account the biomass supply from beyond national borders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 464 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 464 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 71 15%
Student > Master 58 13%
Researcher 52 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 3%
Other 59 13%
Unknown 161 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 16%
Environmental Science 60 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 5%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Chemistry 12 3%
Other 88 19%
Unknown 188 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#729,691
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#96
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,884
of 348,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.