| Title |
Phylogenomics and Molecular Evolution of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecules & Cells, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10059-011-0249-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sook Hee Yoon, Woncheoul Park, Donald P. King, Heebal Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 45% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Molecules & Cells
#180
of 940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,725
of 120,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecules & Cells
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 940 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.