| Title |
A new challenge: grain boundary engineering for advanced materials by magnetic field application
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-006-0740-1 |
| Authors |
Tadao Watanabe, Sadahiro Tsurekawa, Xiang Zhao, Liang Zuo, Claude Esling |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 12 | 28% |
| Engineering | 8 | 19% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Energy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,459,393
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#935
of 4,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,553
of 155,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,611 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.