Title |
The rapid solidification processing of materials: science, principles, technology, advances, and applications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10853-009-3995-5 |
Authors |
Enrique J. Lavernia, T. S. Srivatsan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 284 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 26% |
Student > Master | 45 | 15% |
Researcher | 30 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
Other | 46 | 16% |
Unknown | 59 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Materials Science | 110 | 38% |
Engineering | 70 | 24% |
Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 3% |
Chemistry | 4 | 1% |
Unspecified | 4 | 1% |
Other | 13 | 4% |
Unknown | 82 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,459,393
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#935
of 4,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,415
of 163,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,611 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.