↓ Skip to main content

Relation of Disease with Standardized Phase Angle Among Older Patients

Overview of attention for article published in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Relation of Disease with Standardized Phase Angle Among Older Patients
Published in
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12603-018-1034-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

C.E. Graf, F.R. Herrmann, Laurence Genton

Abstract

A low phase angle (PA) has been associated with negative outcome in specific diseases. However, many patients suffer from several co-morbidities. This study aims at identifying the impact of the type and the severity of diseases on PA in a retrospective cohort study of older people. We included all people ≥65 years who underwent a PA measurement (Nutriguard®) between 1990 and 2011 at the Geneva University Hospitals. PA was standardized for gender, age and body mass index according to German reference values. Co-morbidities were reported in form of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale which considers 14 different organs/systems (disease categories), each rated from 0 (healthy) to 4 (severe illness) (severity grades). The association between the diseases categories and standardized PA was evaluated by a multivariate linear regression. For each significant disease category, we performed univariate regression models. The adjusted R2 was used to identify the best predictors of standardized PA. We considered that the severity grade affected standardized PA if there was a progressive decrease in the regression coefficients. We included 1181 people (37% women). The multivariate regression model showed that the disease categories explain 17% of the variance of standardized PA. Many disease categories affect standardized PA and the ones best associated with standardized PA were the hematopoietic and vascular (R2 7.4%), the musculo-skeletal (R2 5.5%) and the respiratory (R2 4.0%) diseases. The regression coefficients in the univariate linear regression model decreased progressively with higher severity grades in respiratory (-0.15, -0.27, -0.55, -0.67) and musculo-skeletal diseases (-0.09, -0.46, -0.85, -0.86). Many different diseases affect standardized PA. The higher the severity grade in musculo-skeletal and respiratory diseases, the lower is the standardized PA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2018.
All research outputs
#17,548,753
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#1,565
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,480
of 340,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#36
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.