↓ Skip to main content

Spinal anesthesia for surgery longer than 60 min in infants: experience from the first 2 years of a spinal anesthesia program

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anesthesia, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Spinal anesthesia for surgery longer than 60 min in infants: experience from the first 2 years of a spinal anesthesia program
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00540-018-2517-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehdi Trifa, Dmitry Tumin, Emmett E. Whitaker, Tarun Bhalla, Venkata R. Jayanthi, Joseph D. Tobias

Abstract

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is being increasingly used in infants to avoid the potential negative neurocognitive effects of general anesthesia (GA). However, SA has been reported to provide a relatively short duration of surgical anesthesia. We retrospectively reviewed SA cases for surgical procedures lasting more than 60 min in children up to 3 years old. All patients received bupivacaine 0.5% (1 mg/kg up to 7 mg) with clonidine 1 µg/kg ± epinephrine. The primary outcome was success of SA without subsequent conversion to GA. Thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria (all males, age 7 ± 5 months, weight 8 ± 2 kg). Procedures included male genital, groin and multiple site surgeries. Average surgical duration was 71 ± 12 min (range 60-111 min). SA was successful in 31 of 35 patients (89%; 95% confidence interval 78, 99%). The cause of failure was rarely due to the duration of surgery (1 of 4 patients). Six patients with successful SA required sedation with dexmedetomidine ± fentanyl. Differences in procedure duration and patient characteristics were not statistically significant between successful and failed SA. SA is a highly successful technique and may offer an alternative to GA in children undergoing appropriate surgery expected to last as long as 60-100 min.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,645,047
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#111
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,993
of 347,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them