↓ Skip to main content

Interfacial shearing strength and reinforcing mechanisms of an epoxy composite reinforced using a carbon nanotube/carbon fiber hybrid

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Interfacial shearing strength and reinforcing mechanisms of an epoxy composite reinforced using a carbon nanotube/carbon fiber hybrid
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10853-009-3484-x
Authors

Fu-Hua Zhang, Rong-Guo Wang, Xiao-Dong He, Chao Wang, Li-Ning Ren

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 102 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 28%
Student > Master 12 11%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 32 30%
Engineering 27 25%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Energy 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 35 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#1,037
of 4,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,939
of 104,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.