| Title |
Microalgal feeds for aquaculture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, April 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02186067 |
| Authors |
Raymond M. Gladue, John E. Maxey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 37% |
| Engineering | 24 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 56 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#260
of 2,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,839
of 22,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,672 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.