| Title |
Effects of carbon source on growth and morphology of Botryococcus braunii
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-010-9528-4 |
| Authors |
Takako Tanoi, Masanobu Kawachi, Makoto M. Watanabe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 13% |
| Engineering | 17 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#502
of 2,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,472
of 96,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,563 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.