| Title |
Development of media for the mixotrophic/heterotrophic culture ofBrachiomonas submarina
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, August 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02182162 |
| Authors |
Alexander J. Tsavalos, John G. Day |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 33% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 39% |
| Engineering | 8 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#502
of 2,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,356
of 21,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,563 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them