Title |
Growth characteristics of the cyanobacterium Nostoc flagelliforme in photoautotrophic, mixotrophic and heterotrophic cultivation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, May 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10811-008-9341-5 |
Authors |
Haifeng Yu, Shiru Jia, Yujie Dai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 134 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 24% |
Researcher | 25 | 18% |
Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Unknown | 25 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 36% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 14 | 10% |
Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
Engineering | 5 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 15% |
Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,985,616
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#101
of 2,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,794
of 83,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,563 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them