↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic Discordance, Health Information Exchange, and Inter-Hospital Transfer Outcomes: a Population Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
53 news outlets
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic Discordance, Health Information Exchange, and Inter-Hospital Transfer Outcomes: a Population Study
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11606-018-4491-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Usher, Nishant Sahni, Dana Herrigel, Gyorgy Simon, Genevieve B. Melton, Anne Joseph, Andrew Olson

Abstract

Studying diagnostic error at the population level requires an understanding of how diagnoses change over time. To use inter-hospital transfers to examine the frequency and impact of changes in diagnosis on patient risk, and whether health information exchange can improve patient safety by enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Diagnosis coding before and after hospital transfer was merged with responses from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey for a cohort of patients transferred between hospitals to identify predictors of mortality. Patients (180,337) 18 years or older transferred between 473 acute care hospitals from NY, FL, IA, UT, and VT from 2011 to 2013. We identified discordant Elixhauser comorbidities before and after transfer to determine the frequency and developed a weighted score of diagnostic discordance to predict mortality. This was included in a multivariate model with inpatient mortality as the dependent variable. We investigated whether health information exchange (HIE) functionality adoption as reported by hospitals improved diagnostic discordance and inpatient mortality. Discordance in diagnoses occurred in 85.5% of all patients. Seventy-three percent of patients gained a new diagnosis following transfer while 47% of patients lost a diagnosis. Diagnostic discordance was associated with increased adjusted inpatient mortality (OR 1.11 95% CI 1.10-1.11, p < 0.001) and allowed for improved mortality prediction. Bilateral hospital HIE participation was associated with reduced diagnostic discordance index (3.69 vs. 1.87%, p < 0.001) and decreased inpatient mortality (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.89-0.99, p < 0.001). Diagnostic discordance commonly occurred during inter-hospital transfers and was associated with increased inpatient mortality. Health information exchange adoption was associated with decreased discordance and improved patient outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 12%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 23 31%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Computer Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 22 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 414. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#70,321
of 25,335,657 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#75
of 8,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,611
of 338,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,335,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.