↓ Skip to main content

Assessing patient readiness for personalized genomic medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Genetics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Assessing patient readiness for personalized genomic medicine
Published in
Journal of Community Genetics, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12687-018-0365-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caren J. Frost, Irene L. Andrulis, Saundra S. Buys, John L. Hopper, Esther M. John, Mary Beth Terry, Angela Bradbury, Wendy K. Chung, Katherine Colbath, Natalie Quintana, Elizabeth Gamarra, Brian Egleston, Nina Galpern, Lisa Bealin, Gord Glendon, Linda Patrick Miller, Mary B. Daly

Abstract

The Human Genome Project and the continuing advances in DNA sequencing technology have ushered in a new era in genomic medicine. Successful translation of genomic medicine into clinical care will require that providers of this information are aware of the level of understanding, attitudes, perceived risks, benefits, and concerns of their patients. We used a mixed methods approach to conduct in-depth interviews with participants in the NCI-funded Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR). Our goal was to gain a better understanding of attitudes towards different types and amounts of genomic information, current interest in pursuing genomic testing, and perceived risks and benefits. We interviewed 32 women from the six BCFR sites in the USA, Canada, and Australia. In this sample of women with a personal or family history of breast cancer, we found high acknowledgement of the potential of genetics/genomics to improve their own health and that of their family members through lifestyle changes or alterations in their medical management. Respondents were more familiar with cancer genetics than the genetics of other diseases. Concerns about the testing itself included a potential sense of loss of control over health, feelings of guilt on passing on a mutation to a child, loss of privacy and confidentiality, questions about the test accuracy, and the potential uncertainty of the significance of test results. These data provide important insights into attitudes about the introduction of increasingly complex genetic testing, to inform interventions to prepare individuals for the introduction of this new technology into their clinical care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 43%
Researcher 4 9%
Lecturer 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,614,283
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Genetics
#206
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,929
of 330,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Genetics
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.