↓ Skip to main content

Don’t care in SMT: building flexible yet efficient abstraction/refinement solvers

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 111)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Don’t care in SMT: building flexible yet efficient abstraction/refinement solvers
Published in
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10009-009-0133-2
Authors

Andreas Bauer, Martin Leucker, Christian Schallhart, Michael Tautschnig

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
#17
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,898
of 94,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them