↓ Skip to main content

The research subject as wage earner

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The research subject as wage earner
Published in
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, July 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1021265824313
Pubmed ID
Authors

James A. Anderson, Charles Weijer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 19%
Philosophy 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Chemistry 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,516,483
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#205
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,973
of 47,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them