| Title |
Experimental Evidence That GNA and TNA Were Not Sequential Polymers in the Prebiotic Evolution of RNA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00239-007-9017-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ying-Wei Yang, Su Zhang, Elizabeth O. McCullum, John C. Chaput |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 74 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 27 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,708,493
of 23,445,423 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#463
of 1,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,311
of 71,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,445,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.