↓ Skip to main content

Screening Newborns for Congenital Heart Disease with Pulse Oximetry: Survey of Pediatric Cardiologists

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Screening Newborns for Congenital Heart Disease with Pulse Oximetry: Survey of Pediatric Cardiologists
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00246-008-9270-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruey-Kang R. Chang, Sandra Rodriguez, Thomas S. Klitzner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Master 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 51%
Psychology 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#280
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,065
of 82,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.