| Title |
Real-time scratching behavior quantification system for laboratory mice using high-speed vision
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11554-009-0111-7 |
| Authors |
Yuman Nie, Idaku Ishii, Kenkichi Yamamoto, Kensuke Orito, Hiroshi Matsuda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 10% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Real-Time Image Processing
#38
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,012
of 171,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Real-Time Image Processing
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them