↓ Skip to main content

Radiofrequency and microwave interactions between biomolecular systems

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Physics, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 300)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Radiofrequency and microwave interactions between biomolecular systems
Published in
Journal of Biological Physics, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10867-015-9392-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ondřej Kučera, Michal Cifra

Abstract

The knowledge of mechanisms underlying interactions between biological systems, be they biomacromolecules or living cells, is crucial for understanding physiology, as well as for possible prevention, diagnostics and therapy of pathological states. Apart from known chemical and direct contact electrical signaling pathways, electromagnetic phenomena were proposed by some authors to mediate non-chemical interactions on both intracellular and intercellular levels. Here, we discuss perspectives in the research of nanoscale electromagnetic interactions between biosystems on radiofrequency and microwave wavelengths. Based on our analysis, the main perspectives are in (i) the micro and nanoscale characterization of both passive and active radiofrequency properties of biomacromolecules and cells, (ii) experimental determination of viscous damping of biomacromolecule structural vibrations and (iii) detailed analysis of energetic circumstances of electromagnetic interactions between oscillating polar biomacromolecules. Current cutting-edge nanotechnology and computational techniques start to enable such studies so we can expect new interesting insights into electromagnetic aspects of molecular biophysics of cell signaling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 27%
Student > Master 5 15%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Physics and Astronomy 3 9%
Chemistry 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,004,864
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Physics
#43
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,920
of 263,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Physics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them