↓ Skip to main content

Increased efficiency in identifying mixed pollen samples by meta-barcoding with a dual-indexing approach

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
Title
Increased efficiency in identifying mixed pollen samples by meta-barcoding with a dual-indexing approach
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12898-015-0051-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wiebke Sickel, Markus J Ankenbrand, Gudrun Grimmer, Andrea Holzschuh, Stephan Härtel, Jonathan Lanzen, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter, Alexander Keller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 310 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 20%
Student > Master 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 51 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 159 50%
Environmental Science 43 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 9%
Engineering 7 2%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 66 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2015.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,039
of 3,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,574
of 277,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#41
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.