↓ Skip to main content

Function and significance of MicroRNAs in benign and malignant human stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Cancer Biology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Function and significance of MicroRNAs in benign and malignant human stem cells
Published in
Seminars in Cancer Biology, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.07.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

MicroRNAs now not only represent a significant mechanism for post-transcriptional gene regulation, but have come to be appreciated as molecules with far reaching tentacles affecting diverse processes and pathologies by modulating amongst others, cellular gene expression, epigentic mechanisms, complex signaling cacades, cell-cell communication, the immune system and microenvironmental interactions between several cell types, tissues and organ systems. In this review, we systematically reflect on the impact of miRNAs on all types of benign and malignant human stem cells, looking at the roles they play in maintaing or changing the stem cell state, and review how aberrations of their expression and function within diverse types of stem cells orchestrate carcinogenesis and metastasis. As a conclusion, we consider it striking to see how similar some miR-driven mechanisms are between different types of stem cells and cancer cells, and how this might support hypotheses of miR-driven embryologic pathway reactivation in metastasis or propose putative funcions of miRs in important novel cross-topic fields such as obesity and cancer.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Ireland 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Cancer Biology
#1,284
of 1,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,796
of 258,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Cancer Biology
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.