↓ Skip to main content

Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1601 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1078 Mendeley
Title
Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, July 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng-Hsien Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,078 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Macao 1 <1%
Trinidad and Tobago 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 1071 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 221 21%
Student > Master 169 16%
Researcher 117 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 94 9%
Student > Bachelor 64 6%
Other 177 16%
Unknown 236 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 339 31%
Social Sciences 123 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 72 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 2%
Other 169 16%
Unknown 301 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,725,788
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#823
of 2,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,770
of 278,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.