| Title |
Suppression of ectomycorrhizae on canopy tree seedlings in Rhododendron maximum L. (Ericaceae) thickets in the southern Appalachians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mycorrhiza, June 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s005720050262 |
| Authors |
J. F. Walker, Orson K. Miller Jr., T. Lei, Shawn Semones, E. Nilsen, B. D. Clinton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Estonia | 1 | 1% |
| Algeria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 61 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 21% |
| Professor | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 22% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Mycorrhiza
#187
of 692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,564
of 35,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycorrhiza
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 692 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them