You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identification of candidate predictive and surrogate molecular markers for dasatinib in prostate cancer: rationale for patient selection and efficacy monitoring
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, November 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r255 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xi-De Wang, Karen Reeves, Feng R Luo, Li-An Xu, Francis Lee, Edwin Clark, Fei Huang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 62 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 34% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Master | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 15% |
Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
Mathematics | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,489
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,197
of 166,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#23
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.