↓ Skip to main content

The secreted factors responsible for pre-metastatic niche formation: Old sayings and new thoughts

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Cancer Biology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
555 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
636 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The secreted factors responsible for pre-metastatic niche formation: Old sayings and new thoughts
Published in
Seminars in Cancer Biology, January 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.semcancer.2011.01.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Héctor Peinado, Simon Lavotshkin, David Lyden

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 636 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Portugal 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 609 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 165 26%
Researcher 95 15%
Student > Master 84 13%
Student > Bachelor 71 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 6%
Other 83 13%
Unknown 99 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 181 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 140 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 113 18%
Engineering 27 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 3%
Other 41 6%
Unknown 113 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,842,035
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Cancer Biology
#195
of 1,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,784
of 194,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Cancer Biology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.