↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of False Discovery Rates in Multiple Testing: Application to Gene Microarray Data

Overview of attention for article published in Biometrics, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimation of False Discovery Rates in Multiple Testing: Application to Gene Microarray Data
Published in
Biometrics, December 2003
DOI 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2003.00123.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chen-An Tsai, Huey-miin Hsueh, James J. Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 5%
Kenya 3 4%
Netherlands 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Professor 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 33%
Mathematics 13 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Computer Science 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 4 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Biometrics
#452
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,720
of 134,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biometrics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them