| Title |
Microbial fuel cell with an azo-dye-feeding cathode
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00253-009-2147-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liang Liu, Fang-bai Li, Chun-hua Feng, Xiang-zhong Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 27% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 23 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 17% |
| Engineering | 15 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Energy | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,022,830
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,748
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,163
of 114,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#32
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.