↓ Skip to main content

Postural Tachycardia Syndrome: Beyond Orthostatic Intolerance

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Postural Tachycardia Syndrome: Beyond Orthostatic Intolerance
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11910-015-0583-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily M. Garland, Jorge E. Celedonio, Satish R. Raj

Abstract

Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a form of chronic orthostatic intolerance for which the hallmark physiological trait is an excessive increase in heart rate with assumption of upright posture. The orthostatic tachycardia occurs in the absence of orthostatic hypotension and is associated with a >6-month history of symptoms that are relieved by recumbence. The heart rate abnormality and orthostatic symptoms should not be caused by medications that impair autonomic regulation or by debilitating disorders that can cause tachycardia. POTS is a "final common pathway" for a number of overlapping pathophysiologies, including an autonomic neuropathy in the lower body, hypovolemia, elevated sympathetic tone, mast cell activation, deconditioning, and autoantibodies. Not only may patients be affected by more than one of these pathophysiologies but also the phenotype of POTS has similarities to a number of other disorders, e.g., chronic fatigue syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, vasovagal syncope, and inappropriate sinus tachycardia. POTS can be treated with a combination of non-pharmacological approaches, a structured exercise training program, and often some pharmacological support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 188 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Other 22 12%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 47 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Neuroscience 18 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 50 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,375,197
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#54
of 993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,075
of 275,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.