↓ Skip to main content

Medial malleolus screws: out in one view and out

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Medial malleolus screws: out in one view and out
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00590-015-1673-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey C. Wera, David Seligson, John T. Riehl

Abstract

Cartilage damage or mechanical blocking from screw penetration into intra-articular cartilage can reduce the chances of successful outcomes during medial malleolus fixation. There have been diverging opinions among surgeons concerning the reliability of radiographic assessment of fracture fixation and malleolus screw positioning. Therefore, this radiographic study examines the location of medial malleolus lag screws relative to the ankle mortise articular surface. In three Sawbones models, Kirschner wires were overdrilled with a 4.0-mm cannulated cortical screw simulating screws that would be intra- and extra-articular when performing open reduction and internal fixation of a medial malleolar fracture. Under fluoroscopy, images were evaluated to determine whether known intra-articular screws appeared extra-articular in any radiographic view. No image from models with known intra-articular penetration appeared extra-articular in any view or under "live" fluoroscopy. At 20° internal rotation, a screw with a known extra-articular position appeared to be within the cartilage. Intra-operative fluoroscopy is necessary to ensure proper extra-articular placement of screws. If a screw is pictured extra-articular in any radiograph, then it can be assumed that the screw is indeed out of the joint.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 24%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 76%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,283,046
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#540
of 876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,509
of 263,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#11
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 876 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.