↓ Skip to main content

The Effectiveness of Pulsed-Field Magnetization with Respect to Different Performance Bulk Superconductors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 250)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
The Effectiveness of Pulsed-Field Magnetization with Respect to Different Performance Bulk Superconductors
Published in
Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10948-011-1211-8
Authors

Z. Deng, M. Miki, B. Felder, K. Tsuzuki, N. Shinohara, R. Taguchi, K. Suzuki, M. Izumi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,926,585
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
#28
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,571
of 121,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them