| Title |
Biomechanical advantages of dual over single iliac screws in lumbo-iliac fixation construct
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-010-1343-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bin-Sheng Yu, Xin-Ming Zhuang, Zhao-Min Zheng, Ze-Min Li, Tai-Ping Wang, William W. Lu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lebanon | 1 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,026
of 4,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,894
of 94,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,686 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.