Title |
Empirical tight binding parameters for GaAs and MgO with explicit basis through DFT mapping
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Computational Electronics, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10825-013-0436-0 |
Authors |
Yaohua Tan, Michael Povolotskyi, Tillmann Kubis, Yu He, Zhengping Jiang, Gerhard Klimeck, Timothy B. Boykin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
Professor | 5 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 24 | 46% |
Engineering | 14 | 27% |
Materials Science | 6 | 12% |
Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Electronics
#27
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,109
of 284,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Electronics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.