| Title |
Guppy populations differ in cannibalistic degree and adaptation to structural environments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-011-1990-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karin A. Nilsson, Sofi Lundbäck, Alexandra Postavnicheva-Harri, Lennart Persson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
| Researcher | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 14% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,276,851
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#622
of 4,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,487
of 109,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.