| Title |
Miniature bending manipulator for fetoscopic intrauterine laser therapy to treat twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-007-9444-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. Yamashita, K. Matsumiya, K. Masamune, H. Liao, T. Chiba, T. Dohi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,568,674
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,707
of 6,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,607
of 67,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.