↓ Skip to main content

Food Science Dialog 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Food Science Dialog 2015
Published in
Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00003-015-1001-5
Authors

Jan Fritsche, Martin Holle, Katharina Riehn, Gregor Buschhausen-Denker, Till Sager, Antje Steinbicker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
#51
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,451
of 285,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them