↓ Skip to main content

Continuous tuneable droplet ejection via pulsed surface acoustic wave jetting

Overview of attention for article published in Soft Matter, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous tuneable droplet ejection via pulsed surface acoustic wave jetting
Published in
Soft Matter, January 2018
DOI 10.1039/c7sm02534c
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasmine O. Castro, Shwathy Ramesan, Amgad R. Rezk, Leslie Y. Yeo

Abstract

We report a miniaturised platform for continuous production of single or multiple liquid droplets with diameters between 60 and 500 μm by interfacing a capillary-driven self-replenishing liquid feed with pulsed excitation of focussed surface acoustic waves (SAWs). The orifice-free operation circumvents the disadvantages of conventional jetting systems, which are often prone to clogging that eventuates in rapid degradation of the operational performance. Additionally, we show the possibility for flexibly tuning the ejected droplet size through the pulse width duration, thus avoiding the need for a separate device for every different droplet size required, as is the case for systems in which the droplet size is set by nozzles and orifices, as well as preceding ultrasonic jetting platforms where the droplet size is controlled by the operating frequency. Further, we demonstrate that cells can be jetted and hence printed onto substrates with control over the cell density within the droplets down to single cells. Given that the jetting does not lead to significant loss to the cell's viability or ability to proliferate, we envisage that this versatile jetting method can potentially be exploited with further development for cell encapsulation, dispensing and 3D bioprinting applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 28%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 29%
Materials Science 6 10%
Physics and Astronomy 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,587,933
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from Soft Matter
#1,341
of 8,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,914
of 443,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Soft Matter
#104
of 990 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 990 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.