| Title |
Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a pilot randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-014-2479-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie Causarano, Jennica Platt, Nancy N. Baxter, Shaghayegh Bagher, Jennifer M. Jones, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Stefan O. P. Hofer, Anne C. O’Neill, Terry Cheng, Elizabeth Starenkyj, Toni Zhong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 128 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 17% |
| Psychology | 9 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,649,337
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,135
of 4,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,600
of 260,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#19
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.