↓ Skip to main content

A Robust e-Epidemiology Tool in Phenotyping Heart Failure with Differentiation for Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction: the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Robust e-Epidemiology Tool in Phenotyping Heart Failure with Differentiation for Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction: the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12265-015-9644-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzette J. Bielinski, Jyotishman Pathak, David S. Carrell, Paul Y. Takahashi, Janet E. Olson, Nicholas B. Larson, Hongfang Liu, Sunghwan Sohn, Quinn S. Wells, Joshua C. Denny, Laura J. Rasmussen-Torvik, Jennifer Allen Pacheco, Kathryn L. Jackson, Timothy G. Lesnick, Rachel E. Gullerud, Paul A. Decker, Naveen L. Pereira, Euijung Ryu, Richard A. Dart, Peggy Peissig, James G. Linneman, Gail P. Jarvik, Eric B. Larson, Jonathan A. Bock, Gerard C. Tromp, Mariza de Andrade, Véronique L. Roger

Abstract

Identifying populations of heart failure (HF) patients is paramount to research efforts aimed at developing strategies to effectively reduce the burden of this disease. The use of electronic medical record (EMR) data for this purpose is challenging given the syndromic nature of HF and the need to distinguish HF with preserved or reduced ejection fraction. Using a gold standard cohort of manually abstracted cases, an EMR-driven phenotype algorithm based on structured and unstructured data was developed to identify all the cases. The resulting algorithm was executed in two cohorts from the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network with a positive predictive value of >95 %. The algorithm was expanded to include three hierarchical definitions of HF (i.e., definite, probable, possible) based on the degree of confidence of the classification to capture HF cases in a whole population whereby increasing the algorithm utility for use in e-Epidemiologic research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 37%
Computer Science 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,173,005
of 24,598,501 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#383
of 629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,313
of 269,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,598,501 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.