| Title |
Forehead Reflectance Oximetry: A Clinical Comparison with Conventional Digit Sensors during Laparotomic and Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10877-007-9084-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Casati, Grazia Squicciarini, Marco Baciarello, Marta Putzu, Alessandra Salvadori, Guido Fanelli |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 53% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 40% |
| Engineering | 4 | 27% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,568,674
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#208
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,394
of 55,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.