↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of two optimization methods for mesh quality improvement

Overview of attention for article published in Engineering with Computers, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 182)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of two optimization methods for mesh quality improvement
Published in
Engineering with Computers, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00366-006-0015-0
Authors

Lori Freitag Diachin, Patrick Knupp, Todd Munson, Suzanne Shontz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Brazil 2 4%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 45 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 7 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 22 43%
Computer Science 9 18%
Mathematics 3 6%
Chemistry 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,568,674
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Engineering with Computers
#34
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,219
of 66,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Engineering with Computers
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.