↓ Skip to main content

The uptake and bioaccumulation of heavy metals by food plants, their effects on plants nutrients, and associated health risk: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
621 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
883 Mendeley
Title
The uptake and bioaccumulation of heavy metals by food plants, their effects on plants nutrients, and associated health risk: a review
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11356-015-4881-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anwarzeb Khan, Sardar Khan, Muhammad Amjad Khan, Zahir Qamar, Muhammad Waqas

Abstract

Heavy metal contamination is a globally recognized environmental issue, threatening human life very seriously. Increasing population and high demand for food resulted in release of various contaminants into environment that finally contaminate the food chain. Edible plants are the major source of diet, and their contamination with toxic metals may result in catastrophic health hazards. Heavy metals affect the human health directly and/or indirectly; one of the indirect effects is the change in plant nutritional values. Previously, a number of review papers have been published on different aspects of heavy metal contamination. However, no related information is available about the effects of heavy metals on the nutritional status of food plants. This review paper is focused upon heavy metal sources, accumulation, transfer, health risk, and effects on protein, amino acids, carbohydrates, fats, and vitamins in plants. The literature about heavy metals in food plants shows that both leafy and nonleafy vegetables are good accumulators of heavy metals. In nonleafy vegetables, the bioaccumulation pattern was leaf > root ≈ stem > tuber. Heavy metals have strong influence on nutritional values; therefore, plants grown on metal-contaminated soil were nutrient deficient and consumption of such vegetables may lead to nutritional deficiency in the population particularly living in developing countries which are already facing the malnutrition problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 883 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 880 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 120 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 13%
Student > Master 110 12%
Researcher 57 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 4%
Other 135 15%
Unknown 314 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 170 19%
Environmental Science 126 14%
Chemistry 64 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 4%
Engineering 32 4%
Other 99 11%
Unknown 354 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,406,676
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1,553
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,097
of 267,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#17
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.