↓ Skip to main content

A novel posterior approach preserving three muscles inserted at C2 in multilevel cervical posterior decompression and fusion using C2 pedicle screws

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
A novel posterior approach preserving three muscles inserted at C2 in multilevel cervical posterior decompression and fusion using C2 pedicle screws
Published in
European Spine Journal, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00586-017-5402-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazunari Takeuchi, Toru Yokoyama, Takuya Numasawa, Taito Itabashi, Yoshihito Yamasaki, Hitoshi Kudo

Abstract

To present a novel posterior approach in multilevel cervical posterior decompression and fusion (PDF) using C2 pedicle screws that preserves the rectus capitis posterior major, oblique capitis inferior, and semispinalis cervicis. We analyzed 30 consecutive patients who underwent C2-T1 PDF using an approach that preserved these three muscles without resecting. We assessed O-C2 range of motion (ROM), cross-sectional area of the cervical posterior muscles, rotational ROM, visual analog scale (VAS) for axial pain, neck disability index (NDI), and limitations of activities of daily living (ADL) involving neck movements. Mean preoperative O-C2 ROM (23.6°) was significantly increased postoperatively (33.0°). Mean atrophy rate of the cross-sectional area was 3.9%. Postoperatively, 69.8% of the preoperative rotational ROM (113.3°) was retained. The preoperative VAS for axial pain and the NDI did not increase postoperatively. The postoperative O-C2 ROM (33.9°) in 26 patients for whom extension ADL were possible was significantly larger than that in four patients for whom extension ADL were impossible (26.9°). The postoperative retained rate of rotational ROM (75.8%) in 18 patients for whom rotation ADL were possible was significantly larger than that in 12 patients for whom rotation ADL were impossible (62.3%). This is potentially an effective approach for maintaining O-C2 ROM and rotational ROM, which enabled good levels of ADL after C2-T1 PDF. Axial pain and NDI were not worse after PDF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,467,391
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,003
of 4,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,027
of 438,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#13
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,686 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.