↓ Skip to main content

正統的周辺参加論と認知的徒弟制

Overview of attention for article published in Igaku Kyoiku / Medical Education (Japan), August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
正統的周辺参加論と認知的徒弟制
Published in
Igaku Kyoiku / Medical Education (Japan), August 2012
DOI 10.11307/mededjapan.43.292
Authors

西城 卓也

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Igaku Kyoiku / Medical Education (Japan)
#65
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,064
of 179,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Igaku Kyoiku / Medical Education (Japan)
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.