↓ Skip to main content

On peer review in computer science: analysis of its effectiveness and suggestions for improvement

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
On peer review in computer science: analysis of its effectiveness and suggestions for improvement
Published in
Scientometrics, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-1002-z
Authors

Azzurra Ragone, Katsiaryna Mirylenka, Fabio Casati, Maurizio Marchese

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
France 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 37 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Librarian 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Other 12 27%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 16 36%
Social Sciences 14 31%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 1 2%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,702,732
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#912
of 2,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,580
of 199,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#11
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.