↓ Skip to main content

Value of Preoperative PET-CT in the Prediction of Pathological Stage of Gastric Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Value of Preoperative PET-CT in the Prediction of Pathological Stage of Gastric Cancer
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, April 2018
DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6455-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michihiro Kudou, Toshiyuki Kosuga, Takeshi Kubota, Kazuma Okamoto, Shuhei Komatsu, Katsutoshi Shoda, Hirotaka Konishi, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Tomohiro Arita, Ryo Morimura, Yasutoshi Murayama, Yoshiaki Kuriu, Hisashi Ikoma, Masayoshi Nakanishi, Eigo Otsuji

Abstract

Preoperative precise staging is essential for the treatment of gastric cancer (GC); however, the diagnostic accuracy of conventional modalities needs to be increased. The present study investigated the clinical value of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for the staging of GC. This was a retrospective study of 117 patients with a clinical diagnosis of advanced GC who underwent PET-CT followed by gastrectomy. The incidence of FDG uptake in the primary tumor or lymph nodes and its relationship with clinicopathological factors, particularly pathological stage (pStage) III/IV, were examined. FDG uptake in the primary tumor was noted in 83 patients (70.9%). FDG uptake in the lymph nodes was detected in 21 patients (17.9%), and its sensitivity and specificity for lymph node metastasis were 22.7 and 90.5%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that FDG uptake in the primary tumor (odds ratio (OR) 2.764; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.104-7.459, p = 0.029) and that in the lymph nodes (OR 4.660; 95% CI 1.675-13.84, p = 0.003) were factors independently associated with pStage III/IV. FDG uptake in the primary tumor detected pStage III/IV with higher sensitivity (80.4%) and that in lymph nodes found pStage III/IV with higher specificity (88.7%) than those of upper endoscopy plus CT (60.9 and 67.6%, respectively). PET-CT appears to be a useful complementary modality in the assessment of pStage III/IV because of the high sensitivity of FDG uptake in the primary tumor and the high specificity of FDG uptake in the lymph nodes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 28%
Student > Postgraduate 4 16%
Other 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,807,469
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,284
of 6,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,971
of 329,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#59
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.